Philosophy of Language Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Philosophy of Language - Essay Examplethe topic of meaning conveyed with its help. And it was in this aspect of his scholarly activity that contributions of Frege ar perhaps the most wide-ranging. Indeed, Frege defined the majority of the primary problems that the philosophy of lecture had to surmount, formulated most of the fundamental concepts and theories in this field, and set new methodological standards of pedantic scrutiny for the philosophy of language. On ground of all this, the modern philosophy of language has even been equalizeed to footnotes to ideas of Frege. Of course, already before Frege language was viewed as an indispensable mechanism employed by our memory to record our thoughts and used as a means of demeanor of our thoughts to people via verbal communication. But in the end of the 19th century some philosophers started to perceive language in an even more fundamental way - as a tool without the understanding of which it is impossible to swindle live on ing conceptual and ontological problems. It was in this respect that Frege offered a variety of new insights into the functioning of language and its true signifi can buoyce. He was advancing the view that the really human thought as such is influenced by language as a form of symbolic interaction, and as he was interested in the study of the structure of the human thought he was naturally bound to closely analyse language. This is why we may find in his whole kit and caboodle so umteen fine observations that aim to uncover the most elementary principles of language usage (Weiner 2004, pp.1-6, 159-165). One of such subtle themes in works of Frege is his account of indirect speech, which holds an authorized place within his scholarly system where every seemingly minor linguistic mechanism matters. Let us overview his analysis of indirect speech and sweat through its critical evaluation to find out whether Frege gives an adequate account of it.First of all, to understand the plac e of the analysis of indirect speech in the works of Frege we should provide a proper context for its complete understanding. For Frege one of the motivating sources of his linguistic investigations was the dilemma represented by the fact that while language is inevitable for us to be able to generate meaningful thoughts, it is at the same time the barrier for the adequate expression of thoughts because, being a sensible entity, language is used to express insensible thoughts. To find a proper reference point for the judgement on the matter of the possible interrelation that may exist between thought and language, Frege formulated two important concepts that lie at the point of intersection between them. The first such concept is the so-called nose out that is contained in each expression. Sense of an expression relates to the specific way of formulation of description of an object, conception, or function that a certain sentence aims to describe. We may liken the notion of sense to the question how is something expressed in a sentence. Another crucial concept of Frege is the notion of significance, or reference, of an expression, which is the actual object, conception, or function that that expression aims to represent. Similarly, we may liken the notion of reference to the question what does a sentence attempt to tell us. Now, with the help of those two approaches to the analysis of information contained in a particular sentence we can establish that for every meaningful expression there can be only one reference, while there can be different senses that may be used to